Football What Will The New PAT Rules Mean to Football as We Know It What effect will the new point after rule have on the game? by Staff Post May 27, 2015 Al Bello/Getty Images Are you ready for more football? I certainly hope so. Because that is exactly what the NFL is attempting to deliver. They are tinkering with the rules again to give you more football than you have ever had before. What’s interesting is the particular area of the game they are tweaking. More Points Is a Pointless Pursuit The last few years have been ostensibly about player safety. It just happens to coincide with the other focus on making the game more offensively exciting and higher scoring. As a long-time fan of the sport, I cannot imagine why anyone would believe the game has any sort of excitement deficit. If the ball is skillfully thrown and caught for a touchdown, that is wildly exciting to exactly half the viewing audience. If the ball is run for no yards, stuffed at the line of scrimmage by big uglies with names like, “Schlemenheimer”, that is equally exciting to the other half of the audience. Making it easier to score is only exciting to fans of teams that tend to make a habit of losing. Winning teams do not care about how many points are scored. That only matters to losing teams. Helping Those That Need It the Least Traditionally, teams like the San Diego Chargers don’t need more points. For years, they have had Phillip Rivers at the helm and he has been one of the most productive quarterbacks in the league. Stopping others from doing the same has been more their issue. Similarly, a Peyton Manning led team does not have to panhandle for points. Make rules to favor the offense, and Manning will just score more points. The rich get richer. So far, the tinkering has not helped losing teams change their stripes. PAT: Looking for Points in All the Wrong Places If helping strong offenses gain even more points did nothing to help point-starved teams, where might we find a few extra points? Hmmm… Extra points… That’s an idea, and exactly the one the NFL has decided on. The real question is, what effect will it have on the game. Before tackling the real question, let’s take a closer look at why they are doing it in the first place. According to NFL.com: The NFL has been tinkering with the PAT in hopes of making it a more difficult and therefore entertaining play for spectators. The latest change might be just the first step of further adjustments in years to come. The problem with that explanation is that it holds no statistical water. The rule sets the ball on the 15 yard line for an extra point, instead of the 2. That makes it a 32 yard field-goal. In the video from the same page, the pundits acknowledged that kicks from the new distance end up being completed at a 98% rate. That will do nothing to change the coaching calculus when it comes to deciding whether or not to go for two. They are facing the same odds as they were last year. If the NFL had really wanted to make it more difficult, they could have replaced the kick with a play from the 1 for one point, and from the 2 for two points. This will not result in more two-point plays. On rare occasions, the defense will score on a turnover, whereas before, they couldn’t. Here’s to the Losers Bottom line: If your team was a loser before this new rule, it will be a loser when the 2015 season comes to an end. Nothing about this rule will change the equation. If coaches do decide to go for 2 more often, they will probably make it more often. The beneficiaries will be teams with good offenses who are great at scoring points. The desperate teams looking for a miracle will not find one, here. This is football. Did you even watch last year’s Super Bowl? The only way to make the game more exciting is to replace the players with tanks and live ammo. Then again, it wouldn’t be football anymore. And that will be the inevitable fate of the game if we continue this incessant tinkering in search of a few more ratings. Post Views: 1,147 The following two tabs change content below.BioLatest Posts Staff Post Latest posts by Staff Post (see all) In The Zone Announces Initial Podcast Lineup - November 13, 2020 The Essential Resources You Need to Start Your Own Gym in 2020 - February 6, 2020 Wilder vs Fury II – How the second fight will be different to the first? - February 5, 2020 Early turnovers, defensive struggles plague the Scarlet Knights - January 26, 2020 Related TopicsNFl Click to comment You must be logged in to post a comment Login Leave a Reply Cancel replyYou must be logged in to post a comment. Newsletter Subscription Can't Miss Posts! Women in Sports: NHL Network Host, Jackie Redmond by Nicholas Durst | posted on March 4, 2019 From Paramus High School to CBS Sports, Spero Dedes is making waves in sports broadcasting by Sunil Sunder Raj | posted on October 27, 2020 Lochte, Dressel and Ledecky all Chasing Gold at 2021 Tokyo Olympics by Anthony Paradiso | posted on April 18, 2021 Women in Sports: Podcast Host, New York Riptide Sideline Reporter, Dani Wexelman by Luke Porco | posted on March 3, 2020 You Know I’m Right, Episode 109: The Athletic’s Marc Carig (Audio/Video) by Nicholas Durst | posted on April 19, 2021 More in Football You Know I’m Right, Episode 112: New York Jets’ Insider Brian Costello (Audio/Video) On the 112th episode of You Know I’m Right, Nick Durst and Joe Calabrese are joined by... You Know I’m Right, Episode 111: New York Giants’ Insider John Schmeelk (Audio/Video) On the 111th episode of You Know I’m Right, Nick Durst and Joe Calabrese are joined by... You Know I’m Right, Episode 107: New York Post’s Columnist Mike Vaccaro (Audio/Video) On the 107th episode of You Know I’m Right, Nick Durst and Joe Calabrese are joined by... Tea Time with Mel and Jay Ep. 8: Review of Netflix’s “7 Yards” Tea Time with Mel and Jay is a podcast where Melody and Jackie review... Potential Suitors for Former Rutgers RB Ray Rice Ex-RU Tight End Signs With Bengals